My Imminent Return to Social Media

I’ve had an interesting relationship with social media over the last month. In December, I made a resolution to take the month of January off of all social media (which, for me, is basically just Facebook and Twitter). There was one caveat: I’d still post links to new blog posts or articles I’d written, as well as announcements for podcasts I post.

I haven’t really followed the resolution to the letter, but it’s been awful close. I’ve stayed well away from Twitter, but some of my real-world interactions with groups of friends have relied on Facebook invites for so long that I’ve spent some time looking there. In turn, I end up reading a few posts and, today, I responded to one. The perception of my resolution was an all-out ban, which has resulted in some gentle ribbing from some of my friends about the few posts I have put up. And while some would see my minimal access to social media as a failure of my resolution, I’ve found it wildly successful.

Before the resolution, I was allowing Facebook and Twitter to dominate my free time. Every time I was watching a movie, or reading a book, or even playing a video game, I was still periodically checking social media. I was letting it distract from my writing, including my novel and my blog, to the point where I’d go a full week or more without writing a damned thing. I was letting it eat me up.

In the time off I’ve accomplished loads more than I had previously. I’m about to finish a full revision of my novel in less than 3 weeks, a task that took me 10 and 16 weeks, respectively, for my last revisions. I’ve written more, and more substantive, blog posts in that time, and have now put my podcast onto a solid production schedule with definitive publication dates. On top of all that, I’ve learned how to find things I want to watch and read on the internet on my own, rather than relying on links to click-bait sites in my social media feeds.

In February, I’m going to go back to posting and reading social media, but not in as much volume, and hopefully with a more discerning eye for what links I will follow and discussions I’ll take part in. It’s given me perspective on what to share and how to share it, as well, which will (hopefully) be beneficial when I start promoting my book.

This is an experiment I’d implore everyone to try, at least for a little while. The rules don’t need to be hard and fast, and ignore the peer pressure of people telling you how you should be doing it. The break from social media reminded me of how to break out of my echo chamber and find information on my own, which will hopefully lead to me being one of the people who is posting more links for others to read rather than clicking on them. It’s helped my productivity and my overall mental state.

But, in truth, I can’t wait for February to come. There are a lot of social interactions I’m really missing right now, and it’ll be good to remind myself how much fun I have on social media. See you guys in a few days.

Inspiration, Tenacity, and… hoo boy this is a long one…

I’ve read a lot of blog posts and stories from authors about their journey with writing and the things that led to them becoming a full-time writer. Many of these are couched in the guise of writing advice, seeming attempts to latch onto the same anecdotal feel as one of my favorite writing books, Stephen King’s On Writing.

The stories I’ve read are almost universal in their portrayal of depression, self-loathing, and tenacity in the face of overwhelming odds. As the social media/blogosphere has opened up unprecedented access to the thoughts of our favorite authors, aspiring writers are further besieged by tales of financial hardship and mental degradation.

Don’t take this to mean I’m discounting these stories, saying they’re untrue, or even saying they’re not an accurate portrayal of the average writer’s tribulations. I’m just taken aback by a couple of things: first, how different my path to writing has been from most of the stories I’ve read, and second, the alarming detail with which most writers remember their past.
blog_separatorI don’t remember the first thing I ever wrote. I’m always surprised by the stories of other writers, who can remember with perfect clarity every piece that’s ever come off of their pen or keyboard, and can identify the exact moment in their life that fired their desire to be a writer.

My long-term memory has always been shit. With the exception of a few specific, turn-key moments, my childhood is just a giant blur. I have looked at pictures from my childhood – of my family on road trips, of meeting family friends, of birthdays – and don’t remember any of the events depicted there. There are pictures of my brother and I at Bedrock City – an old Flintstones-themed park in Custer, South Dakota – from the early 80’s that I have no recollection of. Disneyland barely registers in a foggy haze of disconnected images.

So trying to remember the first thing I ever wrote isn’t just a chore, it’s likely impossible. I’m not sure how important it is, though. If I can’t remember the first thing I wrote, then it probably doesn’t have much influence on my current writing life.
blog_separatorWriting has always been a background thing for me. I’ve always been a storyteller (just ask my wife how many times she’s heard the same story of something-or-other), but until recently it was never something I actively *did*. I know that there was writing for many classes throughout high school, but I couldn’t tell you what any of those stories were about.

In high-school, I was way more interested in being an artist. I was always drawing. If it wasn’t doodles in my notebooks during class I was practicing techniques to become a comic book artist. I’ve always been into comics, and at one point thought that was a field I’d enter as an artist. My first attempts to get published took the form of comic book pages.

There was a small – and I mean very small – local press in Bend that created small print-runs of anthology comic books that were hand-delivered to the local Oregon comic shops on a bi-monthly basis. I had met the guy who ran the press a few times and, after showing him some of my art, he agreed to publish a 3-4 page story of mine in one of his books. After churning out a terrible 3-page faux-trailer for a 90’s Image gun-toting super-hero, I handed over the pages for the next issue.

He never produced another issue.

Along the same line, I wrote and drew an eight-page story that ended up in a collection of writing and art that was given to students at my high school. Wow, is it bad. The title character’s name is an acronym spelling F.I.R.E.A.R.M. – because, you know, he has a plasma gun for an arm, ala Mega Man. I’m not even going to talk about what that acronym stands for. The story included the line “The killing has become too easy. Living has become too hard.”

Deep.

I was way behind deadline on it and never inked the pages, but the penciled and lettered pages are forever immortalized in a spiral-bound, title-less collection that most of my high-school classmates have probably thrown away by now. I might still have a copy lying around. Maybe.
blog_separatorAfter high school, I thought I knew what I wanted to do. I moved to Seattle and spent 2½ years at the Art Institute working on a computer animation degree that never materialized into anything. I got an internship-turned-full-time-position at Wizards of the Coast, where I was constantly surrounded by writers and artists more talented and interesting than me.

I would like to say that I never allowed that to discourage me, but upon reflection I realize that’s not the case. For a lot of people that discouragement would’ve been front-and-center in their psyche – the sort of thing that leads one to write a blog post about depression and self-loathing. For me, it was more subtle.

The Art Institute had already burned me out on one creative path in my life, so the creative talent at WotC didn’t inspire me as it would others, instead it just pushed my ideas to the background. I subconsciously allowed myself to set those things aside without a fight, and most of my creative pursuits just faded out of my life.

But I was still writing. I was active in a live-action roleplaying game at the time, and had been using that as an outlet. It’s something I’d been doing long before I started at WotC, but somewhere on the internet there are e-mail groups with post upon post of in-game fiction that I was writing about the characters I and my friends were portraying in the game. Over the course of my time in N.E.R.O., Legacies, and Amtgard, I can’t even calculate the output of shared stories I worked on to help fill in the gaps between meetings.

My first real attempt at a novel is an aborted 25,000 words toward an epic fantasy story based on the characters from Amtgard. Of all the things that I’ve written, I would probably credit that story as the spark that made me want to write more seriously.
blog_separatorSometimes I wonder if my lack of depression or notable mental illness is something that hinders my credibility as a writer. So many authors, of varying degrees of fame, tell those stories and identify their experiences with mental illness as informative of their writing. It’s a widely held belief that authors are prone to emotional issues and substance abuse, and that – as horrible as those things can be – they can sometimes lead to moments or periods of creative brilliance.

I don’t really have that. While I have experienced depression in my life, it’s not in the clinical, chronic sense. I get sad when sad things happen and happy when things go right. And while I used to be a pretty cynical person, and I still tend to be a skeptic in a lot of ways, I found a long time ago that I was generally happier living with optimism.

Does that ruin my writer street cred? Writ Cred?

I don’t mean to be glib about other people’s problems. I only find it interesting that because of these kinds of stories from some of the world’s favorite writers, readers tend to automatically associate the term “author” with “depressed, socially awkward alcoholic”, and allow that association to lend some credibility to their artistic output, which I think is bogus.
blog_separatorI’ve always had ideas in my head for stories. I’ve been a gamer all my life, and have been playing Dungeons & Dragons and other roleplaying games since I was 10… ish (I can’t remember exactly when I started; see above about my memory re: my childhood). Most of my story ideas came out in the form of outlines for gaming sessions, most of which were never run. Some of them morphed into bits and parts of roleplay posts for those live-action games, and some of them just banged around in my head with no purpose or outlet.

Toward the end of my time at WotC, when I was still in the midst of that novel attempt, there was an open call for a new novel based on one of the D&D campaign settings. I’d had this idea for a story swimming around in my brain since college that needed an outlet, so I wrote up a proposal and sent it in as part of the contest. I don’t think I ever even got a rejection letter.

So, that idea still hovered around in my brain, and I just couldn’t get rid of it. And, as life continued to intervene and fuel my utter lack of creative motivation, I wasn’t doing anything to get that idea out of my head. The outlet for it seems so simple, in retrospect.
blog_separatorAfter I was laid off from that job, I bounced around a lot and let financial need take over my brain. My wife and I lived pretty broke for a while, and for the next four years or so I floated inside my own head, trying to figure out what I wanted to do next. I had thought to make a career at Wizards, but should’ve known better, and was dumped back into the world, rudderless, at the ripe old age of 23.

A card game that I co-designed was published by Green Ronin Games, but that was about the extent of my creative work. I had a few articles published in the now-defunct Undefeated Magazine (by Pathfinder’s Paizo Publishing), but when that dried up I never pursued that path for writing. It was fun and I made (piddly) money at it, and to this day, I have absolutely no idea why I didn’t go after that.

The natural progression (as my brain told me) was to fall back on my original plan: become an animator. I worked some temp jobs and did some freelance work, but eventually convinced myself that my original path was correct (even though it didn’t pan out) and took a 5-week immersion course at a tiny school called Mesmer Animation Labs. I spent a ridiculous amount of our waning funds on the course and the materials, only to discover a few months after it was over that I had lost interest in an animation career.

I’m very lucky that my wife didn’t murder me.

There are many writers whose story of persistence and tenacity revolves around the idea of always writing, no matter what, and scraping by doing whatever writing they can to make ends meet. That story isn’t my story. The freelance work I was doing was mostly fun, my temp jobs were usually easy, and by the time I’d been a game tester at Nintendo for a while, I didn’t have a lot of reason to go do a shit job for the sake of money.

Testing wasn’t entirely stable, mind you, but it was simple and fun and my co-workers were nerds just like me. I tried working a couple of call-center jobs during my breaks from Nintendo, and couldn’t do it, so I just kept hovering back to testing. It wasn’t what I wanted to do as a career, but at that time I had no fucking clue what I wanted as a career. I just knew this was something I was good at and it made me decent money, so I stayed.
blog_separatorOnce the money situation stabilized, my creative brain started scratching at my skull again. Especially during long periods the utter boredom that is bug testing GameCube games, my ideas would run roughshod over my concentration. I had ideas for short stories, art projects, game designs, you name it. I designed and wrote and entire rulebook for a live-action roleplaying game called Unification, and even went so far as to run it for several months. I designed other card games (none published, yet), wrote some stories, and – eventually – went on to create several podcasts and Geekerific.com.

I’ve spoken before about how the death of my father spurred much of the creative work I started in 2010, beginning with the creation of the After The Fact podcast. That step – using the creation of the podcast and the website to distract me from grief – began a cascading effect with my artistic drive. In the last four years I’ve been more creatively active than in the ten years prior, which led to the conclusion that maybe it was time to bring that to the forefront.

I learned, over the course of 2010, that the only way to get a creative idea to stop waking me up at night was to actually write it down and work on it. I know, I know – it’s quite possibly the most obvious “revelation” in creative history, and one that writers talk about constantly. It just never clicked before, and that realization has spurred a sort of creative renaissance for me.
blog_separatorIn the annals of my history, from – we’ll say – junior high school forward, there are uncounted ideas that I’ve had and let die, or just lost to my shitty long-term memory. I can’t even imagine how many stories I might have been able to write if I’d just taken the time to write notes on the seeds that wafted through my brain when I was younger.

The advantage, I guess, is that most of those ideas were probably utter shit, and it’s probably fine for them to be lost to time immemorial. On the other hand, there was a brief moment after I’d had this Captain Obvious-worthy revelation that I felt a profound sense of loss over all the things I’d let blow away in the breeze.

The beauty of my crappy long-term memory, though, is that I don’t remember a damned one of them, so I don’t have any real reason to latch onto what was lost and despair over it. I can just move forward, unhindered by history, afresh. Yay me?
blog_separatorAfter successfully launching the podcast I’d wanted to work on for quite some time, I decided it was time to get a story that had been banging around in my brain for a decade out of my head. So, toward the end of 2010 I sat down and wrote the first chapter of my first novel. It was like finally taking a piss after being stuck in a car for – roughly ten years. The catharsis was extraordinary, and it was only the first 3,000 words or so.

And then, it sputtered. It took a year to get the first 17,000 words down, and parts of that were like pulling teeth. I had no direction, no focus, and no discipline. I began reading all the writing advice I could get my hands on – blogs, books, podcasts, you name it – and the message was always the same: If you don’t have the discipline to get it down on paper, you’re not a writer. Get the fucker finished and worry about making it good after it’s done.

That first year was rough, trying to work the discipline to write into my daily routine. And by “trying”, I mean not trying at all and just belching out chapters in a haphazard fashion, right up until the last few months of 2011, when I was introduced to NaNoWriMo. Short description: NaNoWriMo stands for National Novel Writing Month, a contest/organization/workshop/social experiment whereby writers are challenged to write a complete 50,000-word novel entirely within the month of November.

Amongst my circle of friends and acquaintances, NaNoWriMo was a constant presence, usually in the form of “I think I might do NaNoWriMo this year.” Most of the “I think”s turned into “I didn’t have the time”s, but I saw a perfect opportunity to artificially introduce the discipline I’d been needing for the last year.

I sort of participated in NaNoWriMo 2011, not insomuch as writing a novel from scratch, instead using it as an excuse to add 50,000 words to my currently 22,000ish word manuscript. I figured if I could succeed in adding that much meat to the novel, I couldn’t possibly set it aside like I had my first attempt. And I was right. I fell 1300 words short of the 50,000-word goal, but the flip side of that is that I now had two complete acts and 70,000 words actually written down, and I was gonna finish this bitch.
blog_separatorI began keeping a story journal. I have a few, now, actually. I have one specifically dedicated to the series of fantasy novels kicked off by my first book, but my favorite is one that I’ve titled my “One Page Idea Book”. When I think of a story, I start a new page in the journal and write down the idea. I confine myself to one page, just to get it out of my head.

I started this journal because I found myself sputtering again after NaNoWriMo. I worked on the book all throughout 2012, but with nothing like the fervor I had for that month. I found myself constantly distracted not only by life, but by other ideas that kept popping into my head while I was trying to think about where to go next with my “main” story. The One Page Idea Book gave me something I desperately needed – finite control on getting ideas out of my head without letting them ramble.

That big push on my novel opened the floodgates in my head, and creative projects just keep tumbling out. That journal has a ton of new ideas for stories, a few of which are even still lingering in my head like Construct (my current novel) did. 2012 was just idea upon idea upon idea, mostly for books and games, but also resulted in a renewed push on my blog and podcasts.

I was amazed at how much actually working on something creative snowballed into an entirely new creative mindset. My priorities began shifting around without prompting, and before I knew it I was taking a serious look at my life balance and, after many discussions and negotiations with my wife, decided that I wanted to be the guy making something, instead of just working for the people who do.
blog_separatorAside from the distraction of new ideas, the hang up in 2012 was a two-fold problem – I really did (do) lack the appropriate discipline to get shit written down in a reasonable amount of time, and I started doubting my ability. I guess this is the part where I have the traditional lack-of-confidence moment that every author talks about, because WOW, I felt like a fraud.

I spent a good chunk of soul searching questioning my abilities, and marveling at the arrogance it takes to think that anyone would ever want to read the shit that I write. It dumped me in a hole for a little while where I couldn’t motivate myself to open that Word file one more time and finish what I’d started. I look back on that time, now, and realize that those moments are exactly what those other writers are writing about.

You may be disappointed to know that I didn’t descend into an alcohol fueled depressive slump. I frequently call bullshit on myself when I’m feeling down, and that’s exactly what I did this time. I took a hard look at how critical I was being and realized that I was being unfair. I hadn’t even finished the fucking thing yet, and I was already doubting my abilities?

Admittedly, this is where the stories of other writers’ depressive tendencies actually helped. I’ve been an artist of some sort all my life, but I still have problems internalizing the idea that every artist – at one point – feels like their creation is crap. Hell, my own father was a fantastic artist – I have a couple of charcoal still-lifes of his that I love – but he was so critical of his own work that he just gave it up and never drew again.

That wasn’t going to be me. I have stories in my head that I want to tell, and I know that I’m the only one that can tell them. I took to heart the stories I’d read and decided that I was going to tell my own, even if they’re all a giant dumpster fire.
blog_separatorToward the middle of 2012, I half-jokingly mentioned to my wife how awesome it would be for me to leave my job at Nintendo and become a house husband. I told her that, in exchange for not having to work, she wouldn’t have to do hardly any chores. She’d have a live-in house boy, and I’d get to write and work on my creative projects. To my surprise and shock, she didn’t laugh me off. In fact, her reaction was more like “ooooh…. That would be awesome.”

I was FLOORED. Fast forward 7-ish months, and that’s exactly what happened. I left Nintendo after nine years, came home, and got to work finishing my novel. I wrote the last words in the manuscript on March 13th, 41 days after leaving my job. I’ve spent the last 11 months revising (I’m working on the fourth draft), querying and being rejected by agents, and researching my options for publishing. And, a few months ago, I threw down the first two chapters of book two.
blog_separatorEven though my story may not be one of depression and broken relationships and drug abuse, I guess it still does ring with that tenacity vibe. For me, it’s all been a matter of discipline, and simply realizing that my creations are unique to me, in spite of the world trying to tell me that I’ll just be another pebble in the gravel pit.

Have I always wanted to be a writer? I have no fucking clue; I can’t remember that far back. Does it really matter? I’m not so sure. I know that I’ve always wanted to make stuff. I want to build something and put it in front of other people and revel in their enjoyment of it. Or hatred, maybe, I don’t know.

My path to this point seems non-standard, if I’m judging by what I’ve read from other writers. Although the impetus for triggering my creative flood was a tragedy, the creation isn’t an attempt to escape from constant tragedy. I am, in spite of being a writer, a generally happy person, and I still consider myself an optimist.

So, my advice? Oh, no, no, nononono. That’s not what this is about. This is just a story. I neither have the experience nor the background to be offering advice, certainly not on writing. Glean what you can from what I write and if it helps you, great, but don’t call it “advice” because then, instead of occasionally just feeling like a fraud, I actually would be.

Weekly Pulls, January 22nd

It’s a middlin’ week for me, numbers wise, but not in quality. I liked what I found in the first issue of Justin Jordan’s Dead Body Road but it didn’t blow me away. I’m hoping that this week’s #2 will ramp it up. A new arc starts in this month’s The Massive, which is good, because the last arc was one of the weakest in the series so far. And, of course, Kelly Sue DeConnick & Emma Rios’s incredible Pretty Deadly gets another installment. For me, I’m really anticipating…

zero_5_coverZero #5. Ales Kot’s timeline-skipping sci-fi military/spy thriller has been fantastic from the get-go, with a couple of real “Holy $#!+” moments in the last two issues. The way the story is constructed makes the new-artist-every-issue formula work really well, and I’ve become a solid fan. The book feels like something written by the love child of Tom Clancy and Michael Crichton, and I can’t get enough. But what I’m really looking forward to this week is…

deadly_class_1_coverDeadly Class #1. Rick Remender is one of those writers who I’ll follow into oblivion. Fear Agent ranks amongst my favorite comics ever, and Black Science is heading into that same territory. Now, take one of my favorite writers and pair him with a story about a high-school for the next generation of elite assassins, with a tagline like “Murder is an art. Killing is a craft. At King’s Dominion high school for the deadly arts, the dagger in your back isn’t always metaphorical, nor is your fellow classmates poison.“? I’m already hooked. But I also have to mention…

planetary_omnibus_coverThe Planetary Omnibus Edition hardcover. Warren Ellis and John Cassaday may very well have peaked with the book that, as we discussed on Trade Secrets Podcast, ranks amongst the best comics ever made. And now, the whole thing is available in a spectacular single-volume omnibus hardcover, and even includes the less-than-stellar spinoff mini-series’? Do it. Do it NOW.

This week’s Honorable Mentions: I’ve been a huge fan of Brian Wood’s run on Conan, but it’s a book I’m getting in hardcovers. If you’re a fan of Howard’s sword-slinging Cimmerian, go grab Conan The Barbarian #24 this week.

Luke’s Picks for January 9th, 2014: Dead Body Road #2, Deadly Class #1, The Massive #19, Pretty Deadly #4, Zero #5, Planetary Omnibus HC

The Possibility of Self-Publishing

I talk a lot about the book I’m writing. I finished the first draft of the book about 10 months ago, and I’m now on my 4th draft of the manuscript. Throughout that time I’ve been diving into research on the publishing industry, weighing my options for getting my book and its sequels published.

My initial idea, and the one I’m still technically following, was to attempt the traditional path first. Send out a ton of queries, find an agent, sell to a publisher, and get the book on physical shelves for a small advance. The advantage of this method is, quite simply, publicity. Having access to a solid editing staff is also a huge boon, but none of that matters if the book isn’t in front of faces. The traditional publishing route has more marketing reach than an individual author (unless that author is named King or Rowling).

Marketing a self-published book is – how can I put this mildly – insanely difficult. Trying to discern the best route for your meager advertising dollars is a brain-melting exercise, and one that may not even see any real results once you’ve figured it out. Getting anyone – even indie book blogs – to review your work is like herding cats, as most of them are already buried under months-long backlog and their submission requirements are getting stricter and stricter as time goes on.

So, while self-publishing might be easier and provide a more immediate, if smaller, return, there’s an almost ironclad guarantee that nobody will even see your book in the first place. Thus, you can’t really sell your book to anyone other than friends and family, sad trombone.

Then why am I now taking a serious lean toward self-publishing my first series of novels?

The short answer is that it feels right for me. I’m not writing a book for money or prestige. While it would give me an amazing heartswell to see one of my books on the shelf at Powell’s, that bit of bragging rights isn’t where my motivations lie. Nor have I ever harbored the illusion that I’d ever be a millionaire playboy philanthropist author. I’m not Richard Castle.

I have stories in my brain, and I want to tell them. I’ve probably forgotten more stories over my life than I’ve saved, mostly because I never really thought about writing them down until the last several years. Writing a book has been exhilarating for me, and I just want it out there, where people can read it. So, when I read a ton of articles from both successful and not-so-successful self-published authors, it’s hard to discern which path is the right one.

In almost every case of someone who’s not an author, the “correct” path is determined by potential financial gain. The idea is that self-publishing is akin to painting a diamond grey and throwing it into a gravel pit expecting someone to find it later. And, to some degree, that’s true. Bestsellers are virtually always backed by a publisher, even if they were self-published first (ala Fifty Shades of Grey).

But if financial gain isn’t really the goal, which is the better option?

That question is harder to answer. The vast majority of fiction authors have other means of income – usually centered around writing, yes, but it’s not their books alone. So finances aren’t really a concern for me, because even if I get traditionally published there’s no guarantee that I’ll even get a “living wage” off of whatever advance I might find as a new author.

And, once you take the money out of the equation, there are a few things that might be deal breakers for me when it comes to traditional publishing. First, is the publishing industry’s notorious reputation for being glacially slow. The time frame from securing an agent to seeing your novel published is measured in double-digit-months, and sometimes years. Second, most publishers want an ironclad non-compete clause in their contract. This prevents authors from doing any kind of work on the same property in any other form – such as digital shorts, stories in fiction magazines, or novellas published through other means. Third, the author has almost no control over subsidiary rights – like foreign language editions or film rights. So I, as the author, have little-to-no say in who makes a movie of my book, if that route becomes a reality.

But most important, for me, is creative control. In this particular instance we’re not talking about a single novel. It’s not a thriller or a romance novel or a dystopian YA book – it’s an epic fantasy series. Series. I’ve already got the framework for 3 ½ books planned, and I know how the whole series is supposed to end. Getting a contract for a potentially 5-book series at a traditional publisher, for a first-time author, for an epic fantasy series, is nigh-impossible. The contract side isn’t a discouragement, though, it’s the simple idea that I might not be able to see the series through like I want to, even though this story’s been in my head for over a decade.

No one should think that I’m saying this because I’ve been rejected too many times. Every major famous author has stories about how many times they were rejected before they sold their first manuscript, and I’m not close to the 50-100 range that many of them are (I’ve been rejected 10 times). So, when I say that I’m leaning toward self-publishing this bad-boy, it’s because I think it might just be the right path for me.

The creative control, the freedom from contracts, the bigger royalties, and the flexibility of distribution are all very attractive to me. It means that I’ll have to put in a metric fuck ton more work than if I had a publisher at my back, but I ain’ scurred. Just know that for brief periods of time during the process you’ll see me turn into a straight-up shill, and I am absolutely not afraid to beg for word-of-mouth publicity.

I said before that I hadn’t made a final decision on which path to take, but it looks like I’m pretty close. And the closer I get to finishing my 4th (and I hope final) draft, the more pressing that decision becomes. We’ll see.

Thoughts On The Pokerstars Caribbean Adventure 2014

Poker TV, in general, is pretty much crap. While I enjoy watching the WSOP broadcasts and I used to enjoy the WPT, they are – as every poker player tries to make clear – not an accurate representation of the game. A lot gets edited out and plays that seem weird in a 2-hour show make total sense if you can see the 7 hours of play that led up to it.

One of my vices, right now, are the European Poker Tour live-streams. I don’t watch a lot of them because, being held in Europe, their timeline doesn’t usually match my sleep schedule. The one event I try to watch each year, though, is the Pokerstars Caribbean Adventure, a large tournament held annually at the Atlantis Resort & Casino in the Bahamas. Several years ago, when Pokerstars partnered with the EPT, this became an EPT event despite not being anywhere near Europe.

The live streams, for the most part, are played without showing the hole cards. The featured tables have the capability, but they don’t start broadcasting with hole cards until the final table, which they play on a 1-hour delay so that it doesn’t affect play (much). Even without hole cards the broadcasts are engrossing, mostly because they are entirely uncut. You get to see every move a player makes, and you get a real sense for the flow of a major multi-table tournament. That didn’t work out quite the way I’d have liked for this year’s PCA, though.

Poker tournaments are unpredictable, and players will bust at the strangest times. In this particular case, Day 5 of the tournament was playing down from 20 players to the final table of 8. The day ended up being very short, with the 9th place player busting less than 5 hours into the day.

What did this mean for the final table? It meant that every player at the table was super deep-stacked, with the average stack having almost 100 big blinds, and even the shortest stack sitting on almost 40. While that made for some awesome deep-stack poker when it was 8- and 7-handed, it also made for an insanely long final table and one of the most boring heads-up competitions I’ve ever seen.

I started watching the live stream at around 11:15am on Monday morning. The final table wrapped up at around 2:45am Tuesday. The 3-handed and heads-up battles lasted hours, and the tournament wound up with a really unfortunate end.

Before I talk about the ending, though, I wanted to touch on something that – as a “poker enthusiast” – I found really interesting. When the tournament got down to 3-handed between Mike McDonald, Isaac Baron, and Dominik Panka, the players stopped the tournament to make a deal. This is pretty standard in large tournaments – the top few payouts are extremely weighted toward first place, and the players like to flatten that out and limit their liability a bit.

Since this was a live-stream and not an edited show, they actually filmed and showed the entire process of the deal. The players discussed their chip-stacks and worked with the tournament directors to flatten the payouts, and the tournament directors actually adjusted the direct payouts so that the players wouldn’t have to come to some sort of under-the-table agreement. Rather than over a million dollars separating 1st and 3rd place, things rounded out to all 3 players getting over a million with only 350,000-ish separating 1st and 3rd. In addition, they set aside 100k to “play for”, that would go solely to the winner along with the title.

As boring as it may sound, I was fascinated by the discussion between the players as they worked out the math using a method called Independent Chip Modeling (or ICM) as a guide. Seeing the tournament directors getting involved was awesome, too, because it’s so much safer for the players when there’s an external entity doling out the money instead of forcing them to rely on and trust each others’ individual judgment to make sure they get paid. This is one of the downsides to the WSOP, in my opinion: They do not endorse or support deal-making, even though it’s an integral part of the larger game, and players have gotten screwed in the past when they’ve attempted to make off-the-books deals with less than trustworthy players.

But I digress. I thought it was cool.

What wasn’t cool was one of the most boring heads-up battles I’ve ever watched. While there were a few interesting hands it was all very straightforward, with McDonald in the lead for what seemed like an eon. Even worse, though, was that after 14 hours of final table coverage, the final half hour of the tournament came due to a fatigue-induced implosion by the tournament favorite, Mike McDonald.

I was rooting for McDonald the whole way. I like the guy. He’s super smart, he’s one of the best No-Limit Hold ‘Em players of the last ten years, and he was well on his way to becoming the first ever 2-time EPT champion. He had small-balled the living crap out of Panka for a couple of hours, maintaining anywhere from a 3-2 to a 2-1 chip lead over him at almost all times. It was when he had a 2-1 chip lead that his slide began, and he sloughed off the tournament on two very suspect hands.

The first hand was 3-betting Panka with KJo. Panka had pocket 9’s and 4-bet shoved. After thinkin for less than a minute, McDonald made a senseless call of Panka’s shove. The 9’s held up and the chip stacks reversed, giving Panka a chip lead that he never relinquished.

I mostly think that McDonald just wanted the tournament over, and was willing to flip for it. I have a feeling that in the back of his mind he had the thought that, under most circumstances, even if he lost the hand he had enough of a skill advantage over Panka that he could battle his way back from a 2-1 chip deficit by using the same small-ball tactics he’d been punishing the guy with all night, but he figured he could end an already long night – where he was obviously fading fast – if he won a simple race.

Unfortunately, a combination of fatigue on McDonald’s part and solid big-stack play on Panka’s part just seemed to wear him down. When Panka raised with A2o after having built a 4-1 chip lead, McDonald completely imploded, making an impatient bluff-shove with 7-4 suited. It was a move that McDonald just didn’t need to make, but you could tell he was exhausted. Panka flopped a meaningless 2, and the board gave McDonald a glimmer of hope when he turned a 7, but an Ace on the river sealed the deal for Panka.

It’s a shame. And a real disappointment for someone who’d watched 14 hours of poker that day and seen McDonald smoothly transition from table domination to chipstack conservation to soul-reading hero calls, proving why he was the favorite right up until a massive deterioration in the last hour of play.

As much a fan as I am of watching these tournaments live, this one gave me pause about watching the next one all the way through. I’m not sure I can stomach seeing that much awesome poker get tossed aside by fatigue and impatience again.

Cascading Inspiration

Since I’ve begun making a solid attempt at writing, I’ve found that the most fun I have “on the job” is when I get sudden, cascading bursts of inspiration.

I’m working on the fourth draft of my first novel, incorporating feedback from my beta readers. I received some invaluable feedback which has resulted in a ton of corrections and re-writes. Some of the most significant changes come at the expense of a character that – only after hearing from readers – I’ve figured is superfluous. So, the vast majority of that character’s appearance – including two full chapters written from his perspective – is being removed from the book.

In the process of working on these re-writes I, of course, have found a number of other changes – both structural and grammatical – that I’ve been working on. Yesterday, a series of those changes sparked a fire in my brain about how the final conflict in my book comes about, and prompted me to write several pages of notes on how to change it. Ideally, the changes will simultaneously add some plausibility to the scene and ratchet up the excitement of the book’s climax, but the brainstorming session brought with it an unexpected benefit.

While I was writing notes for the new scene, I kept thinking up little bits of info for the second book in the series, on which I have only just started working. As I began taking these notes I found myself getting frustrated, much like a kid who has a video game waiting for him but has to finish his chores before he gets to play. The moment I finished the notes for the first book, I plummeted head-first into the notes for the second, and I found myself doing something I haven’t done before: plotting out an entire character’s throughline for the second book.

The notes for the first book would be indecipherable to anyone but me. They’re a haphazard pile of written and re-written ideas with passages scratched out or highlighted, margin notes, and scribbled notes on the margin notes. The “process” worked great for me, because I’d just brain dump into my notes journal anytime inspiration struck.

That’s sort of what happened this time, too, but the process cascaded from a few notes on book one’s climax to scattered character and plot notes for book two to organizing book two ideas and separating them from the book three notes to writing out the entire path of one of the three plotlines in book two. It’s rare that I’ve been struck by this type of hardcore inspiration all at once, and it felt fantastic.

This, without question, is the most fun I have with my writing. Generating random ideas and figuring out whether they’ll work or whether they’re ridiculous (or maybe a combination of both) is invigorating, and tends to be way more interesting than actually coming up with the words. The wordsmithing part of writing is an odd combination of tension, fun, and drudgery, but brainstorming sessions like this one are all the gaiety with none of the grind.

And the beautiful interconnectedness of it all? Yesterday’s note session was like cranking the generator handle that charged up my literary batteries. I can’t wait to dig deep into the second book.

Weekly Pulls, January 9th

Happy New Year! Yeah, I know I missed last week’s pulls, but that’s what we get when new release day is on New Year’s Eve. Aaaannnyyywwwaaayyy…

Three is a consistent book, but its historical trappings may not be for everyone. I like it, and think you should check it out when it comes out in trade form. Letter 44 lost me a little bit with the second issue. Although it had a pretty brilliant opener, I’m not entirely sold on the ongoing story. Issue 3 may be a make-or-break point for me on that book. Mike Carey’s Suicide Risk is consistent, and is my remaining connection to superhero books each month since I don’t read Marvel or DC, and I’m hoping that Fatale picks back up for me since it’s been a little slow the last few issues. On the opposite end of that spectrum…

sheltered_6_coverSheltered continues to be a solid thriller, and ratchets up the tension of its “pre-apocalyptic” world with every issue. The beauty of this book is its firm grounding in human interaction, in a story where we don’t actually know whether an apocalypse is coming (or has come) or not. The sense of absolute isolation created by the scenario that drives the narrative is fantastic, and has me looking forward to every new issue.

sex_criminals_4_coverSex Criminals is one of the strongest books on my shelf right now. the tone is fantastic, the story is compelling, the humor is perfectly delivered. This book just can’t get much better, and this is one of the few comics that I re-read previous issues every time a new one comes out just for the fun of it. What a fantastic book.

This week’s Honorable Mentions: Having just read the entire original series, I’m still a little iffy on 100 Bullets: Brother Lono #7. If you liked it, though, here’s more of it, centered around the original’s number one psychopath. I’m not gonna lie, I loves me some Morning Glories but I read it in hardcover so I’ll have to wait to find out what happens in this week’s Morning Glories #36.

Luke’s Picks for January 9th, 2014: Fatale #19, Letter 44 #3, Sex Criminals #4, Sheltered #6, Suicide Risk #9, Three #4

On Endings and New Beginnings

For most of my life, I’ve failed to get along with my older brother. Our relationship, even when we were kids, was… strained. One of the clearest memories I have of him from my childhood was from just before Christmas, 1989, when I was eleven. Like all kids do, we were searching around our house for our carefully hidden Christmas presents, and I happened to find mine, tucked away in the bottom of the closet of my parent’s camper-trailer. It was a Nintendo GameBoy, the original one, the year it launched.

I had fiddled around with a GameBoy at a local video store and had been begging for one for months. I was out-of-my-mind excited for it. In my euphoria I confided in my big brother about what I’d found. He seemed to share my excitement, telling me how cool it was. That night, I was pulled into our dining room by my parents and dressed down for having looked for and found the presents. My mom was crying – they’d put a lot of planning into this and were disappointed that I ruined the surprise. They contemplated the idea of returning the gift rather than giving it to me. My brother had told them what I’d done.

It might give you an inkling for the direction of this post, when that’s one of the strongest memories I have of my childhood relationship with my brother. For an eleven-year-old, I felt a profound sense of betrayal. I’d looked up to him before then – who doesn’t look up to their big brother? – but I rarely ever trusted him after that point, especially not during our childhood. That event set the tone for our relationship for years to come, and gave me a harsh lesson in the care I must take in choosing who I can trust. If not my own big brother, then who?

Over the years, our relationship had never been what you’d call good. He wasn’t really around for most of my junior high years, having shipped off to the Air Force after graduating high-school. Even after he’d been discharged a few years later and was living somewhat close by, I didn’t spend a whole lot of time with him. When I did, it invariably spiraled into some sort of argument. I remember, when I was in high school, almost coming to blows with him in our house in central Oregon one day, barely dodging out of range of one of his punches.

My brother’s relationship to our family was never very tight. The older he got, the more embittered he became, which led not only to his own constant state of unhappiness but seemingly endless attempts to infringe on the happiness of the rest of our family. More times that I can count, my father or I would have to comfort my mother after he’d made some particularly horrendous comment to her, or railed against some decision or other that my parents had made through the course of their lives. In spite of everything my parents had done for him, there was always another poisonous comment or graceless barb waiting in the wings.

His was an attitude of “I didn’t ask to be born; the world owes me.” That attitude, combined with a constitutional lack of the ability to agree to disagree, poisoned every single relationship my brother ever attempted, from minor acquaintances to significant others to the closest of family. In his world, it is not possible for someone to differ from his opinion without that person being naive, ignorant, fascist, or some combination of the three.

We hung out more often through the late 90’s and early 00’s, but the more time we spent together, the more tense our relationship became. The pressure of our incompatibility would just build and build until finally exploding. Through most of our adult life, our interactions were punctuated by long periods of no contact, inevitably precipitated by some horrendous, un-winnable argument. Over the years, the arguments got worse and worse, not only in intensity but in content. The last truly major argument we had, he was blaming my ailing father for the death of our mother, who passed away from an accidental drug overdose due to a faulty medicine patch (needless to say, it had nothing to do with my father at all).

After that incident, our relationship was basically irreparable. Less than a year later my father passed away, and we made some superficial attempts to be somewhat brotherly again. The idea was a doomed one, unstable because of his dislike for me and my distrust of him. The tragedy of my father’s death brought us back into each other’s presence, but never really brought us closer. I’d realized this, but made the attempt anyway, out of an overinflated sense of family obligation that was never reciprocated. Everyone with whom I confided told me to not bother making the attempt, but I did it anyway because… well, because he was my brother.

Over recent years, not only had we grown apart because of our differing political opinions and underlying mistrust, but he continued to fall down a rabbit hole of borderline racism, blatant homophobia, and excruciatingly ingrained misogyny. But amongst all of that, the thing that I could no longer stand was simply his treatment of the people in his life. The pedestal upon which he placed himself never allowed for anyone to rise out of the muck he perceived them to wallow in, which resulted in a wild and never-ending disrespect for everyone around him.

We’d had yet another falling out a couple of years ago, mostly over political ideals. I asked him to stay away for a while; I needed a break from him if there were ever going to be a chance of repairing what little bond we still clung to. I’d seen him only a handful of times over the last couple of years, mostly on holidays. After spending a mostly nice and only slightly awkward Christmas together this year, he trod all over our relationship once again.

Where am I going with all of this? It starts here:

A few weeks before Christmas I’d watched this video, and it got me thinking. Thinking about the strain of my relationship with my brother, and the impact it was having on my life. Thinking about how often I talked about some shitty comment or other that he had made, thinking about how much of my thought-space he was occupying even without being directly involved in my life. Thinking about how stressed I was every single time I thought about him coming over and spending time in my home, or spending time with him in public.

Ash Beckham’s speech resonated with me deeper than I thought it would, pointing out my own “closet” – that hard conversation I’d had yet to have. Every time I’d had a falling out with my brother, I’d somehow let him back into my life. In most cases, it required an ever-escalating reason to overcome the initial transgression, the final time being the death of my father. I found that my reasoning was always something to the effect of “he’s the only brother I’ve got”. Over time, I began to realize (but didn’t want to admit) that that reasoning wasn’t good enough. It wasn’t enough to overpower all the negativity that came with just being in my brother’s presence.

A few days after Christmas, he lobbed the grenade that finished our relationship. It wasn’t anything that much worse than things he’d done in the past, but it was at a time when I’d finally come to grips with the fact that my familial bond with my big brother just didn’t exist. When, in one fell swoop, he disrespected one of my best friends, my brother-in-law, myself, and even the nice Christmas I’d organized for our family, I couldn’t hold the load anymore.

My brother’s M.O. has always been to act inappropriately and expect an apology after-the-fact to erase his actions. When he attempted his half-assed apology this time, I made the conscious decision not to accept it. I told him it was time for us to go our separate ways. I was oddly serene about it – I wasn’t angry or hurt or upset, I just wanted it over with. I was angered by his actions toward one of my friends, but I wished him no ill-will and simply told him that we’d be better off not being around each other.

In his final act of our relationship, my brother began by taking offense at my “tolerance” of him, and then proceeded to insult almost every portion of my life from my “oversensitivity” to my political stance to my career choices to my marriage, and in the course of that rant provided perfect and final justification for my decision to divest him from my life.

“Family” and “blood” are not synonymous. Whether you’re related by blood or you’ve taken the leap to accept someone as your family, there has to be limits to how far that idea will protect them from consequences. If someone has a cancerous presence in your life, you absolutely must have the will to excise them, regardless of any artificial constructs you may be using to support the idea that the relationship is necessary or unbreakable. We don’t have enough time on this earth to for those ideas to give someone carte blanche to infringe on our happiness.

It took a lot of years and a lot of heartache, stress, tears, and hand-wringing for me to learn this lesson. For the first time in a long time, I feel like I’ve freed up both the mental and emotional space that was occupied by my relationship with my brother, and it’s amazing how relaxed it’s made me. I know that this wasn’t a one-way street – he didn’t get along with me just as much as I didn’t get along with him – so hopefully he’s found the same sort of peace from this parting that I have.

Comic Book Review: Revelations #1

This is a comic book review I wrote for Geekerific.com on January 3rd, 2014.

revelations_coverUntil I began doing some research for this review, I had absolutely no idea that Revelations is a re-print of a six-issue miniseries that was originally published by Dark Horse Comics in 2005. Which is surprising, because I love Humberto Ramos. I loved his work on Spectacular Spider-Man, DV8, Runaways, and even his vampire comic Crimson. His style is one of the most unique in the industry, and I find him sorely underused. Which is why, when I saw his name on the cover of Revelations #1 at my local comic shop, I picked it up with no prior knowledge.

In Revelations, writer Paul Jenkins crafts the story of the death of Cardinal William Richelieu on the grounds of the Vatican. Although the case seems cut-and-dry when ruled a suicide, Cardinal Marcel Leclair recruits his long-time friend, Scotland Yard investigator and self-proclaimed “prolapsed Catholic” Charlie Northern to take a look at the case. I am a bit curious why a Scotland Yard investigator is allowed any jurisdiction in Vatican City, but I’ll just let that one go for now.

Charlie Northern’s acerbic, chain-smoking, conspiracy-theory-loving detective plays a lot like a cross between Robert Langdon and John Constantine, in a very good way. He’s not as unlikable as Constantine nor as pretentious as Langdon, so it’s easy to get caught up in his distaste for his former religion and its trappings when he gets dragged to the seat of its power. Northern is really the only fleshed-out character in the first issue, and he’s surrounded by a somewhat one-dimensional supporting cast. I expect to see more from characters like Marcel and the antagonist Cardinal Toscianni, but the focus of issue one was squarely on Charlie.

The plotline plays much like a Dan Brown novel, as well – a crime thriller with a religious focus and high-conspiracy underpinnings. I’m glad I get to go into it without any knowledge of the previous publication, because it looks to be a fun ride.

And oh man, the artwork.

I’ll preface this by saying that if you already don’t like Ramos’s style, you’re not going to like it here. This book is VERY Humberto Ramos, but with a twist. In much the same way that Matteo Scalera’s art is transformed by Dean White’s painterly colors in Rick Remender’s new book Black Science, the coloring team of Leonardo Olea and Edgar Delgado take Ramos’s lines and create an entirely original look, dominated by pastels and colored pencil style sketch lines. The result is, while thoroughly steeped in Ramos’s exaggerated figure construction, a stunning and different direction for his art. This book looks absolutely fabulous.

The relative lack of information about the original publication may very well be why Boom! Studios chose to reprint it, especially with the talent attached. Although, it might also generate the question “Why reprint this?”. It’s rare for a company to re-serialize a book when they acquire it, so maybe they’re attempting to reach a wider audience and build hype prior to continuing the series beyond this first 6-issue arc. At least, that’s what I can hope.

I don’t know how the original print run sold, or even how many copies were printed, but I’m hoping it turns out to be a hit for Boom! Studios. I really enjoyed this first issue and love the potential it sets up. If you’re not turned off by a story set in the Vatican and all that that entails, go pick this one up.

Review: Revelations #1

revelations_coverUntil I began doing some research for this review, I had absolutely no idea that Revelations is a re-print of a six-issue miniseries that was originally published by Dark Horse Comics in 2005. Which is surprising, because I love Humberto Ramos. I loved his work on Spectacular Spider-Man, DV8, Runaways, and even his vampire comic Crimson. His style is one of the most unique in the industry, and I find him sorely underused. Which is why, when I saw his name on the cover of Revelations #1 at my local comic shop, I picked it up with no prior knowledge.

In Revelations, writer Paul Jenkins crafts the story of the death of Cardinal William Richelieu on the grounds of the Vatican. Although the case seems cut-and-dry when ruled a suicide, Cardinal Marcel Leclair recruits his long-time friend, Scotland Yard investigator and self-proclaimed “prolapsed Catholic” Charlie Northern to take a look at the case. I am a bit curious why a Scotland Yard investigator is allowed any jurisdiction in Vatican City, but I’ll just let that one go for now.

Charlie Northern’s acerbic, chain-smoking, conspiracy-theory-loving detective plays a lot like a cross between Robert Langdon and John Constantine, in a very good way. He’s not as unlikable as Constantine nor as pretentious as Langdon, so it’s easy to get caught up in his distaste for his former religion and its trappings when he gets dragged to the seat of its power. Northern is really the only fleshed-out character in the first issue, and he’s surrounded by a somewhat one-dimensional supporting cast. I expect to see more from characters like Marcel and the antagonist Cardinal Toscianni, but the focus of issue one was squarely on Charlie.

The plotline plays much like a Dan Brown novel, as well – a crime thriller with a religious focus and high-conspiracy underpinnings. I’m glad I get to go into it without any knowledge of the previous publication, because it looks to be a fun ride.

And oh man, the artwork.

I’ll preface this by saying that if you already don’t like Ramos’s style, you’re not going to like it here. This book is VERY Humberto Ramos, but with a twist. In much the same way that Matteo Scalera’s art is transformed by Dean White’s painterly colors in Rick Remender’s new book Black Science, the coloring team of Leonardo Olea and Edgar Delgado take Ramos’s lines and create an entirely original look, dominated by pastels and colored pencil style sketch lines. The result is, while thoroughly steeped in Ramos’s exaggerated figure construction, a stunning and different direction for his art. This book looks absolutely fabulous.

The relative lack of information about the original publication may very well be why Boom! Studios chose to reprint it, especially with the talent attached. Although, it might also generate the question “Why reprint this?”. It’s rare for a company to re-serialize a book when they acquire it, so maybe they’re attempting to reach a wider audience and build hype prior to continuing the series beyond this first 6-issue arc. At least, that’s what I can hope.

I don’t know how the original print run sold, or even how many copies were printed, but I’m hoping it turns out to be a hit for Boom! Studios. I really enjoyed this first issue and love the potential it sets up. If you’re not turned off by a story set in the Vatican and all that that entails, go pick this one up.